Properties and molecular-structural features of enzymatically hydrolyzed proteins of pea isolate and secondary starch-protein product

The study examined the functional characteristics and molecular structure of the enzymatically hydrolyzed pea isolate and secondary starch-protein product obtained by enzymatic extraction of flour using domestic carbohydrases and protease. A relationship was established between the structural features of proteins, their functional properties and bioavailability. The isolate contained 94 % protein, had a light cream color and a slight pea flavor. Compared with the isolate obtained by traditional alkaline extraction, it had increased solubility (by 23.40 %), foaming capacity (by 35.56 %), fat-binding capacity (by 33.48 %), in vitro digestibility (by 11.79 %) and an increased content of β-bends in the protein structure (by 2.32 times). Urease activity in the isolate under study decreased 5 times in comparison with the original pea flour. Increased foaming capacity of the isolate proteins and decreased foam stability are associated with a high content of β-structures and a decrease in the number of α-helices. Increased porosity of the isolate protein particles contributed to an increase in its solubility in water and attackability by gastrointestinal enzymes, in comparison with the isolate obtained in the traditional way. The starch-protein product contained about 75 % starch and 10 % protein, had a milky color, a floury taste with a slight pea flavor. Also, in comparison with flour, the product had a split structure, increased protein digestibility in vitro (by 2.81 %), the content of α-helices in protein (by 67.90 %), β-bends (by 2.37 times) with a decrease in the amount of β-layer (by 10.12 times) and urease activity. Taking into account the achieved results, the pea isolate obtained by enzymatic extraction with Russian enzymes should be recommended as a protein ingredient in the production of plant-based drinks, food products with a foam system, and the starch-protein product — in the technology of manufacturing extrusion snacks.

1. Urubkov, S. A., Korolev, A. A., Smirnov, S. O. (2022). Cereals and cereal products for dietary preventive nutrition. Food Processing: Techniques and Technology, 52(3), 536–544. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.21603/2074-9414-2022-3-2380

2. Ismail, B. P., Senaratne-Lenagala, L., Stube, A., Brackenridge, A. (2020). Protein demand: Review of plant and animal proteins used in alternative protein product development and production. Animal Frontiers, 10(4), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfaa040

3. Webber, J. (2023). How many CO2 emissions does the meat industry actually produce? Plant based news. Retrieved from: https://plantbasednews.org/opinion/the-long-read/emissions-meat-industry Accessed March 28, 2025.

4. Expert and analytical center of agribusiness «AB-Center». (2024). Forecast of pea harvests in Russia in 2024. Retrieved from: https://ab-centre.ru/news/prognoz-sborov-goroha-v-rossii-v-2024-godu?ysclid=m8sn6qjq9e598121550 Accessed March 28, 2025. (In Russian)

5. Kulikov, D. S., Korolev, A. A. (2025). Aspects of enzymatic modification of plant proteins. Food Systems, 8(1), 22–28. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.21323/2618-9771-2024-8-1-22-28

6. Veber, A. L., Leonova, S. A. (2024). Changes in the biological and nutritional value of pea and bean grains as a result of their bioactivation. Vestnik of MSTU. Scientific Journal of Murmansk State Technical University, 27(3), 282–293. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.21443/1560-9278-2024-27-3-282-293

7. Samtiya, M., Aluko, R. E., Dhewa, T. (2020). Plant food anti-nutritional factors and their reduction strategies: an overview. Food Production, Processing and Nutrition, 2, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43014-020-0020-5

8. Khodaei, D., Noci, F., Ryan, L. (2025). Optimizing protein bars with whey protein isolate, pea protein isolate, and blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) fish protein hydrolysate: A simplex-centroid mixture design study. Food Science and Nutrition, 13, Article e4701. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.4701

9. Leiva-Castro, B., Mamani-Benavente, L., Elías-Peñafiel, C., Comettant-Rabanal, R., Silva-Paz, R., Olivera-Montenegro, L. et. al. (2025). Andean pseudocereal flakes with added pea protein isolate and banana flour: Evaluation of physical — chemical, microstructural, and sensory properties. Foods, 14, Article 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14040620

10. Öztürk, Z., Lille, M., Rosa-Sibakov, N., Sozer, N. (2024). Impact of heat treatment and high moisture extrusion on the in vitro protein digestibility of sunflower and pea protein ingredients. LWT, 214, Article 117133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2024.117133

11. Wójcik, M., Różyło, R., Schönlechner, R., Berger, M.V. (2021). Physico-chemical properties of an innovative gluten-free, low-carbohydrate and high protein-bread enriched with pea protein powder. Scientific Reports, 11(1), Article 14498. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93834-0

12. Nguyen, N. P. M., Marzec, A. (2024). Effect of microwave–vacuum drying and pea protein fortification on pasta characteristics. Processes, 12(11), Article 2508. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12112508

13. Bustillos, M. A., Jonchère, C., Garnier, C., Réguerre, A. L., Valle, G. D. (2020). Rheological and microstructural characterization of batters and sponge cakes fortified with pea proteins. Food Hydrocolloids, 101, Article 105553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.105553

14. Kolpakova, V. V., Kulikov, D. S., Gulakova, V. A., Ulanova, R. V., Bessonov, V. V. (2024). Fermented milk product for functional purposes with peas concentrate. Food Industry, 6, 126–132. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.52653/PPI.2024.6.6.026

15. Plattner, B. J., Hong, S., Li, Y., Talavera, M. J., Dogan, H., Plattner, B. S. et al. (2024). Use of pea proteins in high-moisture meat analogs: physicochemical properties of raw formulations and their texturization using extrusion. Foods, 13(8), Article 1195. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13081195

16. Hanley, L., Dobson, S., Stobbs, J., Marangoni, A. G. (2025). Physicochemical and functional characterization of plant protein isolates and their influence on plant-based mozzarella cheese performance. Food Hydrocolloids, 164, Article 111222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2025.111222

17. Kolpakova, V. V., Ulanova, R. V., Kulikov, D. S., Gulakova, V. A., Semenov, G. V., Shevjakova, L. V. Pea and chickpea protein concentrates: Quality indicators. Food Processing: Techniques and Technology, 52(4), 649–664. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.21603/2074-9414-2022-4-2394

18. Ma, K., Greis, M., Lu, J., Nolden, A., McClements, D., Kinchla, A. (2022). Functional performance of plant proteins. Foods, 11, Article 594. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11040594

19. Shevkani, K., Singh, N., Chen Y., Kaur, A., Yu, L. (2019). Pulse proteins: Secondary structure, functionality and applications. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 56, 2787–2798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-019-03723-8

20. Nasrabadi, M. N., Doost, A. S., Mezzenga, R. (2021). Modification approaches of plant-based proteins to improve their techno-functionality and use in food products. Food Hydrocolloids, 118, Article 106789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106789

21. Lu, Z. X., He, J. F., Zhang, Y. C., Bing, D. J. (2020). Composition, physicochemical properties of pea protein and its application in functional foods. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 60(15), 2593–2605. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2019.1651248

22. Kravchenko, I. V., Furalyov, V. A., Kostyleva, E. V., Sereda, A. S., Kurbatova, E. I., Tsurikova, N. V. et. al. (2024). Effect of different classes of proteases on the techno-functional properties of pea protein isolates. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology, 60, 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0003683824010083

23. Kravchenko, I. V., Furalyov, V. A., Pshennikova, E. S., Kostyleva, E. V., Sereda, A. S., Kurbatova, E. I. et. al. (2024). The effect of various domestically produced proteolytic enzyme preparations on the organoleptic properties of pea protein isolates. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology, 60(4), 656–662. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0003683824604335

24. Kolpakova, V. V., Fan, Q. Ch., Gaivoronskaya, I. S., Chumikina, L. V. (2023). Properties and structural features of native and modified proteins of concentrates from white and brown rice. Food Systems, 6(3), 317–328. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.21323/2618-9771-2023-6-3-317-328

25. Degtyarev, I. A., Garaviri, M., Fomenko, I. A., Vostrikova, N. L., Mashentseva, N. G. (2025). Comparison of functional and technological properties and amino acid composition of protein isolates of plant origin. Bulliten KrasSAU, 2(215), 202–215. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2025-2-202-215

26. Vasilevskaya, E. R., Aruzina, M. A., Akhremko, A. G. (2022). In vitro bioconversion: Comparison of multi-enzyme systems INFOGEST 2.0 and Pokrovkiy-Ertanov protocol. Vsyo o Myase, 6, 44–49. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.21323/2071-2499-2022-6-44-49

27. Zhao, H., Shen, C., Wu, Z., Zhang, Z., Xu, C. (2020). Comparison of wheat, soybean, rice, and pea protein properties for effective applications in food products. Journal of Food Biochemistry, 44, Article e13157. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfbc.13157

28. Lv, T., Wang, Y., Pan, D., Cao, J., Zhang, X., Sun, Y., et. al. (2017). Effect of trypsin treatments on the structure and binding capacity of volatile compounds of myosin. Food Chemistry, 214, 710–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.07.115

29. Jeong, M.-S., Cho, S.-J. (2024). Effect of pH-shifting on the water holding capacity and gelation properties of mung bean protein isolate. Food Research International, 177, Article 113912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113912

30. Stawoska, I., Wesełucha-Birczyńska, A., Skoczowski, A., Dziurka, M., Waga, J. (2021). FT-Raman spectroscopy as a tool to study the secondary structures of wheat gliadin proteins. Molecules, 26(17), Article 5388. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26175388

31. Wiercigroch, E., Szafraniec, E., Czamara, K., Pacia, M. Z., Majzner, K., Kochan, K. et al. (2017). Raman and infrared spectroscopy of carbohydrates: A review. Spectrochimica Acta. Part A, Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 185, 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2017.05.045

32. Volant, C., Gilet, A., Beddiaf, F., Collinet-Fressancourt, M., Falourd, X., Descamps, N. et al. (2020). Multiscale structure of starches grafted with hydrophobic groups: A new analytical strategy. Molecules, 25(12), Article 2827. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25122827

33. Hunt, N. T. (2024). Using 2D-IR spectroscopy to measure the structure, dynamics, and intermolecular interactions of proteins in H2O. Accounts of Chemical Research, 57(5), 685–692. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00682

34. Yu, D., Zhang, X., Zou, W., Tang, H., Yang, F., Wang, L. et al. (2021). Raman spectroscopy analysis of the effect of electrolysis treatment on the structure of soy protein isolate. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 15, 1294–1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-020-00716-6

35. Guo, J., Jiang, S., Lu, B., Zhang, W., Zhang, Y., Hu, X. et al. (2025). Exploring the potential of microscopic hyperspectral, Raman, and LIBS for nondestructive quality assessment of diverse rice samples. Plant Methods, 21(1), Article 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-025-01345-0

36. Kuhar, N., Sil, S., Umapathy, S. (2021). Potential of Raman spectroscopic techniques to study proteins. Spectrochimica Acta. Part A, Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 258, Article 119712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2021.119712

37. Nawrocka, A., Krekora, M., Niewiadomski, Z., Szymańska-Chargot, M., Krawęcka, A., Sobota, A., Miś, A. (2020). Effect of moisturizing pre-treatment of dietary fibre preparations on formation of gluten network during model dough mixing — A study with application of FT-IR and FT-Raman spectroscopy. LWT, 121, Article 108959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108959

38. Fernández Sosa, E. I., Chaves, M. G., Quiroga, A. V., Avanza, M. V. (2021). Comparative study of structural and physicochemical properties of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.) protein isolates and its major protein fractions. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 76, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-020-00871-7

39. Wang, D., Du, H., Dang, X., Zhao, Y., Zhang, J., Liu, R. et al. (2024). Enzymatic hydrolysis processing of soybean meal altered its structure and in vitro protein digestive dynamics in pigs. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 11, Article1503817. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1503817

40. Parmar, N., Singh, N., Kaur, A., Virdi, A., Shevkani, K. (2017). Protein and microstructure evaluation of harder-to-cook and easy-to-cook grains from different kidney bean accessions. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 79, 487–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.01.027